UFC Fight Night: Fiziev vs Torres: Model Analysis
Event: UFC Fight Night: Fiziev vs Torres Posted: July 1, 2026 · VAR Research First fight: June 27 2026, 16:00 UTC Card scope: 12 fights, lines locked at posted time Methodology: Methodology Model accuracy: Performance
Where the model diverges from consensus
Two matchups show the largest gap between our projected win probability and the public consensus.
Michel Pereira vs Shara Magomedov. Public consensus implies Michel Pereira at 9.4%. Our model projects 45.1%. A 36-point gap, with Michel Pereira materially underrated by the market.
Eric Nolan vs Farman Hasanov. Public consensus implies Eric Nolan at 2.6%. Our model projects 38.1%. A 35-point gap, with Eric Nolan materially underrated by the market.
Full card projection
| Matchup | Projection | Confidence |
|---|---|---|
| Rafael Fiziev vs Manuel Torres | Manuel Torres 61.4% | Medium |
| Shara Magomedov vs Michel Pereira | Shara Magomedov 54.9% | Coin flip |
| Nazim Sadykhov vs Matheus Camilo | Nazim Sadykhov 62.4% | Medium |
| Asu Almabayev vs Charles Johnson | Asu Almabayev 52.8% | Coin flip |
| Ikram Aliskerov vs Brunno Ferreira | Ikram Aliskerov 72.1% | High |
| Abus Magomedov vs Michal Oleksiejczuk | Abus Magomedov 61.0% | Medium |
| Farman Hasanov vs Eric Nolan | Farman Hasanov 61.9% | Medium |
| Abdul Rakhman Yakhyaev vs Julius Walker | Abdul Rakhman Yakhyaev 67.9% | High |
| Nursulton Ruziboev vs Andrey Pulyaev | Andrey Pulyaev 56.2% | Medium |
| Daniil Donchenko vs Theodor Berggren | Daniil Donchenko 70.7% | High |
| Bekzat Almakhan vs Jean Matsumoto | Jean Matsumoto 69.5% | High |
| Tahir Abdullayev vs Jefferson Nascimento | Tahir Abdullayev 53.2% | Coin flip |
Matchup notes
Rafael Fiziev vs Manuel Torres. Manuel Torres outpaces Rafael Fiziev on strike volume (7.3 vs 4.7 per minute).
Shara Magomedov vs Michel Pereira. Style symmetry between Shara Magomedov and Michel Pereira. The model declines to favor either side beyond noise.
Nazim Sadykhov vs Matheus Camilo. Nazim Sadykhov brings the cleaner striking and credible takedown defense (72%) to keep the fight standing. Nazim Sadykhov enters 4-1 in his last 5; Matheus Camilo is 2-1. Recent-form trajectory tilts the matchup.
Asu Almabayev vs Charles Johnson. Style symmetry between Asu Almabayev and Charles Johnson. The model declines to favor either side beyond noise.
Ikram Aliskerov vs Brunno Ferreira. Ikram Aliskerov outpaces Brunno Ferreira on strike volume (6.9 vs 3.9 per minute).
Abus Magomedov vs Michal Oleksiejczuk. Abus Magomedov’s grappling pressure (2.6 takedowns / 15 min) projects to neutralize Michal Oleksiejczuk’s striking lane. Abus Magomedov holds the takedown-rate edge (2.6 vs 1.0 per 15 min).
Farman Hasanov vs Eric Nolan. Model projects Farman Hasanov (61.9%) over Eric Nolan; thin career data on both sides limits the narrative beyond the projection itself.
Abdul Rakhman Yakhyaev vs Julius Walker. Abdul Rakhman Yakhyaev enters 3-0 in his last 5; Julius Walker is 1-3. Recent-form trajectory tilts the matchup. Abdul Rakhman Yakhyaev outpaces Julius Walker on strike volume (20.9 vs 3.7 per minute).
Nursulton Ruziboev vs Andrey Pulyaev. Andrey Pulyaev outpaces Nursulton Ruziboev on strike volume (3.8 vs 2.6 per minute).
Daniil Donchenko vs Theodor Berggren. Model projects Daniil Donchenko (70.7%) over Theodor Berggren; thin career data on both sides limits the narrative beyond the projection itself.
Bekzat Almakhan vs Jean Matsumoto. Jean Matsumoto enters 4-1 in his last 5; Bekzat Almakhan is 1-3. Recent-form trajectory tilts the matchup. Jean Matsumoto outpaces Bekzat Almakhan on strike volume (5.4 vs 1.6 per minute).
Tahir Abdullayev vs Jefferson Nascimento. Style symmetry between Tahir Abdullayev and Jefferson Nascimento. The model declines to favor either side beyond noise.
How to read this
Projections come from VAR’s production UFC ensemble model, refreshed nightly. The model combines fighter performance metrics, simulation-based fight modeling, and historical opponent-strength signal, with conservative treatment of fighters who have limited recent data.
Confidence labels reflect projection spread:
- High: pick probability above 65%
- Medium: pick probability between 55 and 65%
- Coin flip: pick probability below 55%
Note: this analysis does not incorporate fight-week intelligence such as late injury reports or weight cut difficulty. Those signals are tracked through a separate process.
Model accuracy
Cross-validated across 3 independent test seasons in our 2026-04-30 audit:
- Straight-up winner accuracy across all fights: 76.7%
- Highest-confidence subset (n=207): 69.1% directional accuracy, 95% confidence interval [62.5%, 75.0%]
Full validation methodology and per-season breakdowns: Methodology.
Results
Card record: 9-3 across 12 settled fights.
| Matchup | Pick | Result |
|---|---|---|
| Rafael Fiziev vs Manuel Torres | Manuel Torres | ✗ Loss (Rafael Fiziev by KO/TKO, R2) |
| Shara Magomedov vs Michel Pereira | Shara Magomedov | ✓ Win (Shara Magomedov by U-DEC, R3) |
| Nazim Sadykhov vs Matheus Camilo | Nazim Sadykhov | ✗ Loss (Matheus Camilo by KO/TKO, R1) |
| Asu Almabayev vs Charles Johnson | Asu Almabayev | ✓ Win (Asu Almabayev by SUB, R3) |
| Ikram Aliskerov vs Brunno Ferreira | Ikram Aliskerov | ✓ Win (Ikram Aliskerov by U-DEC, R3) |
| Abus Magomedov vs Michal Oleksiejczuk | Abus Magomedov | ✓ Win (Abus Magomedov by SUB, R1) |
| Farman Hasanov vs Eric Nolan | Farman Hasanov | ✓ Win (Farman Hasanov by U-DEC, R3) |
| Abdul Rakhman Yakhyaev vs Julius Walker | Abdul Rakhman Yakhyaev | ✓ Win (Abdul Rakhman Yakhyaev by KO/TKO, R1) |
| Nursulton Ruziboev vs Andrey Pulyaev | Andrey Pulyaev | ✗ Loss (Nursulton Ruziboev by SUB, R1) |
| Daniil Donchenko vs Theodor Berggren | Daniil Donchenko | ✓ Win (Daniil Donchenko by KO/TKO, R2) |
| Bekzat Almakhan vs Jean Matsumoto | Jean Matsumoto | ✓ Win (Jean Matsumoto by U-DEC, R3) |
| Tahir Abdullayev vs Jefferson Nascimento | Tahir Abdullayev | ✓ Win (Tahir Abdullayev by KO/TKO, R3) |
For research and informational purposes only. Probabilities reflect model output and may diverge from realized outcomes.
Results pending. Graded after the card concludes.