Research / Model Analysis

UFC Fight Night: Kape vs Horiguchi: Model Analysis

Event: UFC Fight Night: Kape vs Horiguchi Posted: June 18, 2026 · VAR Research First fight: June 21 2026, 00:00 UTC Card scope: 11 fights, lines locked at posted time Methodology: Methodology Model accuracy: Performance

Where the model diverges from consensus

Two matchups show the largest gap between our projected win probability and the public consensus.

Leon Shahbazyan vs Levan Chokheli. Public consensus implies Leon Shahbazyan at 25.1%. Our model projects 52.6%. A 28-point gap, with Leon Shahbazyan materially underrated by the market.

Melsik Baghdasaryan vs Murtazali Magomedov. Public consensus implies Melsik Baghdasaryan at 24.3%. Our model projects 45.0%. A 21-point gap, with Melsik Baghdasaryan materially underrated by the market.

Full card projection

Matchup Projection Confidence
Manel Kape vs Kyoji Horiguchi Manel Kape 67.6% High
Ion Cutelaba vs Navajo Stirling Navajo Stirling 67.8% High
Hyder Amil vs Christian Rodriguez Christian Rodriguez 74.9% High
Melsik Baghdasaryan vs Murtazali Magomedov Murtazali Magomedov 55.0% Coin flip
Vinicius Oliveira vs Andre Fili Vinicius Oliveira 76.1% High
Andre Lima vs Kevin Borjas Andre Lima 69.7% High
Allan Nascimento vs Mitch Raposo Allan Nascimento 55.2% Medium
Gaston Bolanos vs Michael Aswell Jr. Michael Aswell Jr. 57.6% Medium
Leon Shahbazyan vs Levan Chokheli Leon Shahbazyan 52.6% Coin flip
Karol Rosa vs Luana Santos Luana Santos 52.6% Coin flip
Shane Collins vs Otari Tanzilovi Shane Collins 52.5% Coin flip

Matchup notes

Manel Kape vs Kyoji Horiguchi. Manel Kape outpaces Kyoji Horiguchi on strike volume (5.0 vs 3.8 per minute).

Ion Cutelaba vs Navajo Stirling. Navajo Stirling brings the cleaner striking and credible takedown defense (75%) to keep the fight standing. Navajo Stirling outpaces Ion Cutelaba on strike volume (6.1 vs 4.3 per minute).

Hyder Amil vs Christian Rodriguez. Christian Rodriguez’s grappling-vs-striking matchup tilts the projection. Christian Rodriguez absorbs notably less (2.9 vs 4.0 per minute), projecting better damage profile through three rounds.

Melsik Baghdasaryan vs Murtazali Magomedov. Style symmetry between Murtazali Magomedov and Melsik Baghdasaryan. The model declines to favor either side beyond noise.

Vinicius Oliveira vs Andre Fili. Vinicius Oliveira enters 4-1 in his last 5; Andre Fili is 2-3. Recent-form trajectory tilts the matchup. Vinicius Oliveira absorbs notably less (2.7 vs 4.2 per minute), projecting better damage profile through three rounds.

Andre Lima vs Kevin Borjas. Andre Lima enters 4-0 in his last 5; Kevin Borjas is 1-4. Recent-form trajectory tilts the matchup. Andre Lima absorbs notably less (2.5 vs 5.6 per minute), projecting better damage profile through three rounds.

Allan Nascimento vs Mitch Raposo. Allan Nascimento enters 4-1 in his last 5; Mitch Raposo is 1-2. Recent-form trajectory tilts the matchup. Allan Nascimento outpaces Mitch Raposo on strike volume (3.1 vs 1.7 per minute).

Gaston Bolanos vs Michael Aswell Jr.. Michael Aswell Jr. outpaces Gaston Bolanos on strike volume (9.6 vs 3.3 per minute).

Leon Shahbazyan vs Levan Chokheli. Style symmetry between Leon Shahbazyan and Levan Chokheli. The model declines to favor either side beyond noise.

Karol Rosa vs Luana Santos. Style symmetry between Luana Santos and Karol Rosa. The model declines to favor either side beyond noise.

Shane Collins vs Otari Tanzilovi. Style symmetry between Shane Collins and Otari Tanzilovi. The model declines to favor either side beyond noise.

How to read this

Projections come from VAR’s production UFC ensemble model, refreshed nightly. The model combines fighter performance metrics, simulation-based fight modeling, and historical opponent-strength signal, with conservative treatment of fighters who have limited recent data.

Confidence labels reflect projection spread:

  • High: pick probability above 65%
  • Medium: pick probability between 55 and 65%
  • Coin flip: pick probability below 55%

Note: this analysis does not incorporate fight-week intelligence such as late injury reports or weight cut difficulty. Those signals are tracked through a separate process.

Model accuracy

Cross-validated across 3 independent test seasons in our 2026-04-30 audit:

  • Straight-up winner accuracy across all fights: 76.7%
  • Highest-confidence subset (n=207): 69.1% directional accuracy, 95% confidence interval [62.5%, 75.0%]

Full validation methodology and per-season breakdowns: Methodology.

Results

Populates after card concludes.


For research and informational purposes only. Probabilities reflect model output and may diverge from realized outcomes.

Results

Results pending. Graded after the card concludes.